Difference Between Iso 14001 And 14004

Both old and new standards cover essentially the same topics. However, there are some important differences.

Some of these are discussed below. Structure of standard Perhaps the biggest difference between the old and the new standard is the structure.

This is because the new edition uses the new Annex SL template. According to ISO, all future management system standards (MSSs) will use this new layout and share the same basic requirements. As a result, all new MSSs will have the same look and feel. A common structure is possible because basic concepts such as management, requirements, policy, planning, performance, objective, process, control, monitoring, measurement, auditing, decision making, corrective action, and nonconformity are common to all management system standards. A common structure should make it easier for organizations to implement multiple standards because they will all share the same basic language and the same basic requirements.

What is the difference between ISO 14000 standards and IS/ISO 14000 standards? The guidelines in IS/ISO 14004 are applicable to any organization, regardless of its size, type, location or level of maturity. While the guidelines in ISO 14004 are consistent with the IS/ISO 14001.

Context of the organization Unlike the old standard, the new one expects you to understand your organization's external context and its internal context before you establish its. This means that you need to identify and understand the external issues and the external environmental conditions that could influence your organization's EMS and the results that it intends to achieve. It also means that you need to identify and understand the internal issues and internal environmental conditions that could influence your EMS and the results in intends to achieve. The new ISO standard also expects you to identify the interested parties that are relevant to your EMS and to identify their needs and expectations. Once you've done this, it expects you to study these needs and expectations and to figure out which ones have become. But why is all this necessary?

It's necessary because your EMS will need to be able to manage all of these influences. Once you understand your context, you're expected to use this knowledge to help you define your EMS and the challenges it must deal with. Risk planning Unlike the old standard, the new ISO 14001 standard expects you to determine “”.

So what does this mean and what does the new standard expect you to do? It expects you to start by establishing a risk planning process. It then expects you to use this process to identify risks and opportunities related to your organization’s unique, its, its, and its.

It then expects you to define actions to address all of these risks and opportunities. And to make sure that these actions will actually be carried out, it asks you to make these actions an integral part of your EMS, and then to implement, control, evaluate, and review the effectiveness of these actions and these processes. While risk planning is now an integral part of the new ISO 14001 standard, it does not actually expect you to implement a formal risk management process. Preventive action The new ISO 14001 standard no longer uses the term preventive action. We’re now expected to use risk planning concepts and to think of the entire EMS as a system of preventive action. ISO section A.10.1 says there is no longer a single clause on preventive action because “One of the key purposes of an environmental management system is to act as a preventive tool. This concept of preventive action is now captured in 4.1 (i.e., understanding the organization and its context) and 6.1 (i.e., actions to address risks and opportunities).” So, according to the new standard, these two sets of requirements cover the old concept of preventive action.

Evidently, once we realize that the entire EMS can be used to manage risks and opportunities, we no longer need a separate clause on preventive action. It's redundant. Documented information The new ISO standard has also eliminated the long standing distinction between documents and records. Now they're both referred to as “ ”. Why ISO chose to abandon two common sense concepts and replace them with one that is needlessly awkward and esoteric is not entirely clear. According to ISO's definition, the term documented information refers to information that must be controlled and maintained.

(Repeat 2 times) Bebo di yaan gallan. Bebo diyan gallan pink pink lyrics. (Repeat 2 times) Saanu lagda ose kudi dan Nakhra laike behjun Pher taan bas alfaj vi yaaron Ohda hoke reh jun Ik paase laundi laare Ik paase kare ishare Kabbi ankh nu kare blink Bebo di yaan gallan. Pink pink Pink pink.

So, whenever ISO uses the term documented information it implicitly expects you to control and maintain that information and its supporting medium. However, this isn't the whole story.

An annex to the new ISO standard (A.3) further says that “this international standard now uses the phrase ' retain documented information as evidence of' to mean records, and 'maintain documented information' to mean documentation other than records.” So, whenever the new ISO 14001 standard refers to documented information and it asks you to maintain this information, it is talking about what used to be referred to as documents, and whenever it asks you to retain this information, it is talking about what used to be called records. So sometimes documented information must be maintained and sometimes it must be retained (contrary to what ISO's official definition says). So, while the official definition of the term documented information abandons the distinction between documents and records, through the use of the words 'maintain' and 'retain' and because of what this means (according to Annex A), the main body of the standard actually restores this distinction.

In other words, while documents and records were officially kicked out the front door, they were actually allowed back in through the back door. Procedures The old ISO 14001 standard asked organizations to establish a wide range of procedures. These included an environmental aspects procedure, a legal requirements management procedure, an awareness procedure, a communications procedure, a documents procedure, an operational procedure, an emergency preparedness and response procedure, a monitoring and measurement procedure, a compliance evaluation procedure, a nonconformity management procedure, a record keeping procedure, and an audit procedure. Now, only one procedure is left. The new ISO standard asks you to establish an emergency preparedness and response procedure in section 8.2, and that's the only one.

The same procedure can be followed on Ubuntu 16.04, Linux Mint, Debian and other related Linux systems to install JDK 10. How to Install Oracle Java on Ubuntu Linux Three Methods: Optional: How to enable Oracle Java in your Web Browsers Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox Community Q&A This tutorial will cover the installation of 32-bit and 64-bit Oracle Java 7 (currently version number 1.7.0_45 ) JDK/JRE on 32-bit and 64-bit Ubuntu operating systems. Install java jdk on ubuntu linux system.

Instead of asking you to write procedures, the new standard expects you to maintain and control a wide range of documents (i.e., documented information). Since the new standard doesn't tell you what to call these documents, you can call them procedures if you like. And, of course, you still need to have documents except that now they're called “documented information”. So, while on the surface this looks like a radical change, it probably isn't. Other clarifications and modifications The old ISO 14001 standard asked you to 'define and document the scope of its ' (4.1), but it didn't say anything about how this should be done. The new ISO standard clarifies how this ought to be done (4.3). It now asks you to consider your compliance obligations, your corporate context, your physical boundaries, your products and services, your activities and functions, and your authorities and abilities when you define the scope of your EMS.

And it asks you to include all products, services, and activities that have significant environmental aspects. The new term ' compliance obligation' has replaced the rather cumbersome phrase: “legal requirements and other requirements to which the organization subscribes”.

However, the meaning is the same. There are two kinds of compliance obligations: mandatory compliance obligations and voluntary compliance obligations. Mandatory compliance obligations include laws and regulations while voluntary compliance obligations include contractual commitments, community and industry standards, ethical codes of conduct, and good governance guidelines. A voluntary obligation becomes mandatory once you decide to comply with it. The new standard no longer refers to environmental targets. According to section A.6.2, 'The concept of “target” used in prior editions of this International Standard is captured within the definition of “environmental objective”. You can, of course, still set targets and call them targets if you wish.

The only real difference is that the new ISO 14001 standard thinks of a target as a type of objective. Life cycle considerations were largely ignored by the old standard. Now they're central. ISO 14001 now expects you to use a life cycle perspective to “identify the environmental aspects and associated environmental impacts of its activities, products and services that it can control and those that it can influence” (section 6.1.2). The term “management representative” has been officially dropped. The management duties and responsibilities that were previously assigned to someone called a “management representative” may now be assigned either to one person or to many.

Of course, you may continue to use this job title if you wish. Has also been updated. Praxiom Research Group Limited 780-461-4514 Updated on January 31, 2016. First published on January 11, 2015. Legal Restrictions on the Use of this Page Thank you for visiting this webpage. You are welcome to view our material as often as you wish, free of charge. And as long as you keep intact all copyright notices, you are also welcome to print or make one copy of this page for your own personal, noncommercial, home use. But, you are not legally authorized to print or produce additional copies or to copy and paste any of our material onto another web site or to republish it in any way.

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) is a managing body that was founded to provide quality and systems to industries across the world. The and standards are accreditations that are issued to organizations that meet or exceed the criteria set by the ISO. The certifications, which differ in criteria, have been proven to increase profitability and commercial status for the holding parties. Some of the core differences between these two standards stem from the criteria covered by each. As a certification, ISO 9001 is awarded based on set standards being met in the key areas of quality management systems, management responsibility, resource management, and how quality performance is measured, analyzed, and improved.

The standard ISO 14001 is an environmental management certification that is designed to assist organizations as they develop in-house environmental management systems. This standard is based on a model of continual improvement, which differentiates it from the fixed criteria that must be met to be awarded ISO 9001 accreditation. For an organization to achieve the certification, it must develop an ISO 14001-compliant through a process of planning objectives, implementing processes, measuring and monitoring the processes, and improving the system based on the results of the monitoring stage. As a part of ISO 14001 accreditation, a continual improvement process (CIP) is required. This CIP is based on expanding the environmental management system across all sectors of the business, using the system to enrich other processes and improving over time by continual monitoring. Many organizations seek to be awarded both ISO 14001 and ISO 9001 certification as it demonstrates a high overall standard of quality and environmental management structures.

The scope of each standard is what defines the differences between them. The routes to accreditation and methods of maintaining the systems once certification has been achieved are similar across both standards.

Both can be applied for once a compliant management system has been implemented following the ISO guidelines. An intensive external will be required for either standard with an additional required for ISO 9001. Both are measures of the processes used by an organization, not the end product. This means that a company that holds ISO 9001 accreditation can still produce a poor end product if the correct paperwork is in place and the quality is consistent. Similarly, ISO 14001 certification simply means that there is a system in place to meet that organization’s specific environmental targets.